Jun 30, 2008

After Reboot

Last thursday I spoke on Reboot on the emergence of virtual gated communities and the way handle these. The reactions after the presentation and other speakers during Reboot brought me inspiration for some extension on my vision. I will address this here later in a post. As you see I write this in English for the possible readers of the Reboot participants.

Before going into the new views, I will shortly summarize my presentation. The slides can be find on slideshare.

The presentation can be concluded in four statements.

People will me more and more live in online communities in continuous state of conversation. The current publishing model for content will still exist, but the way we search and reach content will primarily through the conversation with our peers.

The online communities we live in will get more and more personal and enter our personal private space. It is therefor very likely that we will create 'virtual gated communities' where we choose our own friends and set more and more restrictions on privacy.

The providers of communities like Facebook and Twitter will have to develop a way to offer interoperability of the groups we create. The community is not the same as the provider, we want to have our community over different providers.

To reach the new online consumer living in the virtual gated communities the best recipy for success is an exploding strategy. You need to go out for the touchpoints where the conversation takes place and not expect the prospects will come to your own environment.



It was good to hear during the sessions I was not the only one who was thinking about the subject.

Thomas vander Wal's talk stressed the role of groups in the success of social networks.

Jyri presented his vision on nodal points again, just like on The Web And Beyond in Amsterdam. The importance of the nodal points is in essence an exploding strategy; go to where your users are.
In the after math of his talk he added an even more interesting point that we will need audience management when the popularity of the social networks is growing. I think this is a great way to have a concrete translation of the vision of virtual gated communities.

Michael Jackson shows us some examples of the exploding website. He talked about it in another perspective: it is impossible to earn enough money with advertising model with a regular site; to earn the bannerspace you need to bring the functions to the banner.

In the thoughts after my presentation one question was about the different roles in a community. This is something I have been thinking about in the preperation of my talk, but couldn't complete in the short time there was. I will elaborate more on that later.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ha Iskander, mooie presentatie. Goed neergezet ook het idee van de gated community, ik denk ook zeker dat een dergelijke ontwikkeling voor veel mensen een aanleiding kan zijn om meer mee te gaan doen, en niet alleen te lurken. Maar ik snap even de link naar de exploding strategy niet,of eigenlijk het concept Exploding Strategy. Kun je daar wat meer over zeggen. (Zal vats in je presentatie voorbij zijn gekomen :)

Iskander Smit said...

Dank Martijn.
Inderdaad heb ik er meer over gezegd in de presentatie. Ik zal de transcript van mijn praatje ook nog even online zetten binnenkort.

In het kort: wat we bij Info.nl met de exploding website bedoelen is het idee dat de eigen website niet het startpunt is om je (online) dienstverlening te laten gebruiken, maar dat je naar de gebruiker toemoet.
Hier heb ik daar meer over geschreven.

In relatie tot de gated community gaat er om dat je dus binnen de community relevant diensten (in functie, maar ook 'moment-relevant') moet bieden om mensen die primair daar leven te kunnen bereiken.

Hopelijk helpt dit iets. En anders moeten we er nog maar een keer IRL van gedachte over wisselen!

Anonymous said...

Interessant verhaal.
Joshua Porter zegt op zijn blog Bokardo.com:
"Personal value precedes network value. What this means is that if we are to build networks of value, then each person on the network needs to find value for themselves before they can contribute value to the network."
Vind ik nog wel een mooie toevoeging aan je verhaal.

Iskander Smit said...

Jep. Dank. Joshua zegt goede dingen altijd ;-)

Ik geloof ook erg in de theorie van Tom Coates die aangeeft dat een succesvol sociaal netwerk drie niveaus toegevoegde waarde moet opleveren:
1. voor jezelf
2. voor jou samen met je peers
3. voor de rest

Zie ook zijn presentatie